“Consciousness creates reality.” This statement has changed the scientific and medical landscape, and alternative media outlets around the world have and continue to explore its meaning and implications for out future. Countless scientists study this idea and how it might be correlated with the nature of our reality.
It raises the question, what is consciousness?
Consciousness includes a number of things. It’s how we perceive our world, it’s our thoughts and intentions, it’s being aware, and so more.
“Looking for consciousness in the brain is like looking in the radio for the announcer.”
– Nasseim Haramein, Director of Research for the Resonance Project
“I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from consciousness. We cannot get behind consciousness. Everything that we talk about, everything that we regard as existing, postulates consciousness.”
– Max Planck, the theoretical physicist who originated quantum theory, which won him the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1918
“It was not possible to formulate the laws of quantum mechanics in a fully consistent way without reference to consciousness.”
– Eugene Wigner, theoretical physicist and mathematician
The notion that “consciousness creates reality” raises so many questions. Does this mean we as individuals (and on a collective level, as one human race) can shape and create whatever reality we’d like for ourselves? Does it mean we can manifest a certain lifestyle, and attract certain experiences? Does it happen instantly? Does it take time? How do we do it?
We know so little still. Although we might not be able to answer these questions with scientific certainty, we do know that yes, a correlation between consciousness and our physical material world does indeed exist in some way. The extent of that correlation is still poorly understood, but we know it’s there, and we know it must have some sort of significance.
According to RC Henry, a professor of physics and astronomy at Johns Hopkins University, in a 2005 essay:
A fundamental conclusion of the new physics also acknowledges that the observer creates the reality. As observers, we are personally involved with the creation of our own reality. Physicists are being forced to admit that the universe is a “mental” construction.
Pioneering physicist Sir James Jeans wrote: “The stream of knowledge is heading toward a non-mechanical reality; the universe begins to look more like a great thought than like a great machine. Mind no longer appears to be an accidental intruder into the realm of matter, we ought rather hail it as the creator and governor of the realm of matter. Get over it, and accept the inarguable conclusion. The universe is immaterial-mental and spiritual.
The Science Behind the Statement “Consciousness Creates Reality”
The quantum double slit experiment is one way we can see how consciousness affects the physical material world. One potential revelation of this experience is that “the observer creates the reality.” A paper published in the peer-reviewed journal Physics Essays by Dean Radin, PhD, explains how this experiment has been used multiple times to explore the role of consciousness in shaping the nature of physical reality.
In this experiment, scientists use a double-slit optical system to test the possible role of consciousness in the collapse of the quantum wave-function. They had predicted the ratio of the interference pattern’s double slit spectral power to its single slit spectral power would decrease when attention was focused toward the double slit as compared to away from it, yet instead found that factors associated with consciousness “significantly” correlated in predicted ways with perturbations in the double slit interference pattern. In other words, scientists affected the results of the experiment just by observing it.
“Observation not only disturbs what has to be measured, they produce it. We compel the electron to assume a definite position. We ourselves produce the results of the measurement.”
Although this is one of the most popular experiments used to posit the connection between consciousness and physical reality, there are several other studies that clearly show that consciousness, or factors that are associated with consciousness, directly affect our reality. A number of experiments in the field of parapsychology have also demonstrated this.
Sure, we might not understand the extent of this connection, and in most cases scientists can’t even explain it. However they are, and have been observed time and time again.
Below is a video demonstration from the film What The Bleep Do We Know.
Other examples we’ve written about include government sponsored psychokinesis experiments, the global consciousness experiment, intelligence agency remote viewing experiments, thoughts and intentions altering the structure of water, the placebo effect, teleportation studies, and more. You can find more details about those specific experiments here.
How We Can Incorporate This Information Into Our Lives and Use Consciousness to Transform the World
Change requires action, but the place within ourselves that we take action from makes a big difference in the outcome.
Modern day science, especially quantum physics, has been catching up to ancient mysticism and concepts deeply ingrained in various cultures throughout the ancient world. One great example of this is the fact that everything is energy, and nothing is solid. You can read more about that here.
“We are what we think. All that we are arises with our thoughts. With our thoughts we make the world.”
– Gautama Buddha
“Broadly speaking, although there are some differences, I think Buddhist philosophy and Quantum Mechanics can shake hands on their view of the world. We can see in these great examples the fruits of human thinking. Regardless of the admiration we feel for these great thinkers, we should not lose sight of the fact that they were human beings just as we are.”
– Dalai Lama (source)
A great example of quantum physics meeting ancient wisdom can be seen in the fact that Nikola Tesla was influenced by Vedic philosophy when pondering his ideas of zero point energy. You can read more about that here.
So why is this relevant? Because new physics is finally discovering that the observer shapes the reality. The way we think and perceive could significantly impact our lives and the world around us.
“No problem can be solved from the same level of consciousness that created it.”
– Unknown
If we look at the world and examine it on a collective level, what do we see? How do we perceive it? Right now, the masses believe a ‘normal life’ means going to school, paying bills, raising a family, and finding a ‘job’ within the current paradigm to support yourself. Many people on the planet are not resonating with this experience, however.
They want change. We’ve been repeating and perceiving our reality this way for a very long time, as though we are drones trained to accept things the way they are; to not question what is happening in our world and to continue on with the status quo, only caring for ourselves and our own lives.
As Noam Chomsky would say, our consent has been manufactured. If we continue down this path and continue to perceive and view reality as “this is just the way it is,” we will, in essence, prolong that type of existence and experience for the human race without ever changing it.
In order to create and manifest a new reality for ourselves, our thought patterns and the way we perceive reality must change. What changes the way we perceive reality? Information. When new information emerges it changes the way we look at things and, as a result, our reality changes too, and we begin to manifest a new experience and open our minds to a broader view of reality.
What’s also important about teachings from new physics is that, if consciousness creates reality, that means change starts within. It starts with the way in which we are observing the outer world from our inner world. This touches on the earlier point of how we perceive our reality. Our perception of the external world might very well be a reflection of our inner world, our inner state of being.
So ask yourself, are you happy? Are you observing, perceiving, and acting from a place of love? Or from a place of hate or anger? All of these factors are associated with our consciousness and observation; the one (or the many) who are doing the “observing” might significantly impact the type of physical world the human race manifests for itself.
What do you think?
We are indeed observers, and we can create change and break patterns to open up new possibilities, all through the way in which we observe ourselves, others, and the world around us.
I believe that the human race is in the process of waking up to a number of different things at once, and as a result, the way we perceive and “observe” the world around us (on a mass scale) is shifting drastically. So if you want to help change the world, change the way you look at things, and the things you look at will change.
“There is nothing new to be discovered in physics now. All that remains is more and more precise measurement.”
Lord Kelvin made this statement in 1900, and was proven wrong only five years later when Einstein published his paper on special relativity. The new theories proposed by Einstein challenged the current framework of understanding and forced the scientific community to consider new ideas about our world. This stands as a great example of how things that once were regarded as truth can and do change.
“Be the change you wish to see in the world.”
– Mahatma Ghandi
“Lord Kelvin’s statements bares with it the voice of paradigms past. . . . We knew that the Earth was flat, we knew that we were the centre of the universe, and we knew that a manmade heavier-than-air piece of machinery could not take flight. Through all stages of human history, intellectual authorities have pronounced their supremacy by ridiculing or suppressing elements of reality that simply didn’t fit within the framework of accepted knowledge. Are we really any different today? Have we really changed our acceptance towards things that won’t fit the frame? Maybe there are concepts of our reality we have yet to understand, and if we open our eyes maybe we will see that something significant has been overlooked.”
– Terje Toftenes (source)
“No problem can be solved from the same level of consciousness that created it.” – Albert Einstein
“No problem can be solved by the same KIND OF THINKING that created it.” Albert Einstein (https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Talk:Albert_Einstein#Einstein.27s_.27No_problem.27_quote_out_of_context)
The problem of this article does already start here: “Consciousness Creates Reality” – Physicists Admit The Universe Is Immaterial, Mental & Spiritual “because it is wrong
Physicist Einstein admitted the Universe as E,m and c.The conscious part of the Universe is c(light,wave), the material part of the Universe is m(particle,matter) and the immaterial part of the Universe is E(energy)
To understand the Universe is only for people being able to count up to 3
In the “old words” of Christianity 1,2,3 is Father(E), Son(m) and Holy Spirit(c) Holy Spirit is our consciousness expressed as the Universe on the Quantum Level as wave. QM and RT fit together very well when we will change our still distorted and curvatured view, our paradigma from individual ego asking to collective higher self answering. The only evolution that really is, is the evolution of our Holy Spirit of asking and answering, creating probabilities as waves,expressed by the wave function in QM and the corresponding material reality. This CO-response of matter is expressed as c² in E=mc².
Einstein was also the physicist to speak:
“Physics without religion is lame and religion without sciences is blind.”
which corresponds perfectly to E,m and c as Father, Son and Holy Spirit.
“Welcome back my friends to the game that never ends”
Realy nice addon for the article Christian, thanks!
So you’re saying that… the ‘father’ = ‘the son squared’ times ‘the speed of the holy spirit’?
Just because there are 3 christian entities, and 3 variables in einsteins equation… that doesn’t mean they are at all related. Einsteins equation doesn’t even describe something related to god, it describes the amount of energy needed to achieve a specific amount of movement. Your comment is silly.
There were also 3 little pigs, do you believe these too to be representation of the holy trinity or are they some other math equation waiting to be discovered? Maybe pig*3+brick+wolf=safe?
The silly pigs are in and from your mind Dexter. Have a look at the the history and definition of energy. It is the same like god. It is something we are believing in and we are operating with, but no one has ever seen pure energy. Energy is neither a physical substance nor something objective. It is an idea, something metaphysical.
You can abuse the mental concepts of sciences and religions to seperate or use to unite, it is up to you.Judging other people to be silly doesn’t make you more intelligent.
Yes, and we all know that the SQUARE root of three is 1.7320508 and therefore, I will drink water three times today. But seriously, this was a very interesting article and the video was also educational.
“Consciousness Creates Reality” WE do not expect acknowledgements nor reward from earth scientific community benefiting from Dr. Turi’s unsurpassed cosmic work and commitment since we abducted him ***August 11th, 1991*** and downloaded him with the cosmic code jurisdictions.
What scientists discovered today was a truth years earlier to our host making him the originator of a cosmic phenomenon humanity MUST acknowledge to fight invasive groups of ET’s.
WE ordered him to SEAL the truth for the current and future generations and reward purposes. No human allowed to forget nor ignore the truth of a Majestic 12. https://www.youtube.com/watch…
“The future is nothing else than the reincarnation of the thought.” Dr. Turi. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4BX3TzPUt08&feature=youtu.be
My host world wide notoriety served the OCD generation of dry scientists well. http://www.drturi.com/a-generation-of-born-ocd/
The Galactic Federation Grand Cosmic Order recognize his cosmic values and rewarded his work for humanity. Dr. Turi is part of the Majestic 12 (or MJ-12) – Code name of the chosen ones, a secret committee of cosmic conscious superhuman spiritual leaders, working with Draconians Extraterrestrial officials.
His highly spiritual advanced work will be recognized after his departure from this dense physical world! His work to free humanity from fear, ignorance and introduce various groups of ET’s and God cosmic Divinity to humanity will be achieved. Read more about consciousness and UFO https://www.facebook.com/AlienDr.Turi
In this content, you are mixing physicist theory and scientific evidence already made and checked by mathematic. Indeed, as observer, we can’t see everything right, as if there was a mystery lurking somewhere and impossible to see. Electron doesn’t react alike when they are observed by human, true !. However, we know some facts in astronomy that are true and demonstrate by real mathematic clues. Therefore, the universe is not immaterial, just mathematical. We just can’t figure out how it works and we will never know it, I think… because we are human. The universe is not immaterial, mental and spiritual, but we are ! That is why you guys think that, I guess…
Mathematics is abstract in the sense that it lacks any material basis. Hence, if “the universe is not immaterial, just mathematical,” then the universe is necessarily abstract, or immaterial, insofar as it lacks any material basis.
We utilize numbers and quantities, or apply mathematics to our sensory experience, in order to attain understanding of our perceptual existence and achieve a degree of management over our very own functionality.
Yes AEIOU this is a good point indeed !!
Can you answer this: In your dream can you say while dreaming-this is only a dream- when I wake up all my exitement wil vanish. No right-you think it is real. Likewise what if life is like that playing t oyour perception.
I have been in a dream and knew I was and manipulated it. I’ve done this a few times in my life.
A dream is real so long as it lasts.. Can we say anymore for life?
Actually, yes, you can. It’s called ‘lucid dreaming…’
Stick with the basics . If you believe that everything is going to stop because you’re not around , I’ve got a series called the Twilight Zone for you to believe .
Just stick with this one law and you’ll be alright , ” Energy Cannot be Created or Destroyed “.
Exactly…
in the first paragraph: (and has been for quite sometime) should be (and has been for quite some time)*
Regarding true reality and where it can be found, it is my understanding that when we ‘die’ the body goes back to nature as they are both part of the material illusion. We ourselves are of a spiritual nature and return home on our being re-absorbed back into the Oneness of the Source from which we originated. Our brains are not actually ‘us’ at all. They are utilised by the spirit in much the same way that we are using our computers right now. The computer isn’t actually part of us, but it is enabling us to communicate. Our bodies, in turn, are not actually part of us, but are needed to navigate through the illusional notion of everything being separated into countless beings, objects and elements, that we are currently inhabiting – and mistakenly believing to be ‘real’.
As we are born out of the illusion (not ‘into’ – think about it) with no guidance whatsoever beyond those who are already trapped within it, taking it to be ‘real’ – and the one and only ‘real’ there is – is an easy thing to do. Not so easy to undo, but not by any means impossible.
Our big problem is that back in the mists of long-passed time we have somehow forgotten what we truly are. Bodies are not needed in the spiritual Oneness of Reality. By Oneness, I mean simply that. Nothing is separated, All is whole, complete, eternal, infinite, unlimited and unchanging. The perfect opposites of a perfect separation – beginnings and endings, good and evil, birth and death, day and night, left and right, up and down, etc etc, only exist here within this experience. Oneness, being eternal, has no beginnings or endings or opposites of any kind. No opposites = no conflict. All is one and one is all. I know it is not an easy notion to grasp fully at first, but that’s because the mainstream thinking of the world is so opposite to the Truth, as one would expect in a world like this. One of chaos, as opposed to Reality’s total peace.
Spiritual and unseen, peace, joy and happiness are enveloped within the Oneness of the Source. Perfect Love, its total Truth currently beyond our understanding, is the only Reality. Having said that though, God, or the Source’s, world of Oneness is detectable here even though it is unseen. Things from His world cannot be given away, whereas earthly things can. For example. if I give a person my hat, I no longer have a hat. In fact, if I give away anything from the material world I no longer have it. But if I give a person Love, Joy and Happiness, all things from the unseen Oneness, I not only still have them myself, they are multiplied many times over. This is because in the unseen world of Oneness, everything is one and giving is the same as receiving, just as having is the same as being. In the world of Reality, there is no lack at all.
The way out is forgiveness in the form of realising that we are all inhabiting what amounts to no more than a chaotic nightmare and that nobody has actually done anything or committed any crime whatsoever. The Truth really does set you free. A nightmare is only a nightmare until the dreamer awakens.
Thanks for sharing this, man. Amazing! Have you heard of the site called TRUTHCONTEST ? It is made for the disussion about the truth of life. I suggest you to go there, read “The Present” and join us in revealing the truth of our existence. A bright mind like you could give immense contribution. Thanks again and see ya there hopefully. Cheers 🙂
Thank you. No, I hadn’t heard of truthcontest, but I’ll certainly look it up. Cheers mate.
Hi Steven, I would certainly love to hear your thoughts regarding the truthcontest. There are various different to read, one uses religion and one does not. 🙂
Wow Steven you put it perfectly there, I see you have a truly great and deep understanding that is inline with my own belief.
Thank you Travis. It is the result of 5 years daily and ongoing devotion to the study of ACIM, amongst other input, and it has changed my life infinitely for the better. Your beliefs being inline with mine, I think you’d be interested in another piece I put together concerning the ‘mystery’ of time.
As follows: There is nothing really mysterious about time. We live in an illusional world of separation as opposed to the true world of complete, unchanging, eternal and unlimited Oneness. In order to bring about the illusion of separation, space is required to demonstrate that all things here are parted and observable as individual items. Time is created as a by-product as it is required to cross space. Without space, there would be no time as there is nothing to cross. As nothing is separated in the Oneness of True Reality, space and time are not required. Our illusional lives consist of literally trying to join things back together again in an attempt to make sense of something that makes no sense at all. Chaos as opposed to the perfect Oneness of the Source.
Cheers mate.
As long as there is motion of or change amongst circumstances, there will be a sense of time. For instance, think of existence or the world of things as a chessboard and its corresponding pieces; as long as the pieces stand still, so too does the sense of time. Likewise, as long as there is motion, there will be a sense of space. Space and time, as Einstein demonstrated, are definitively intertwined. It could be said that our sense of space and time (or space-time) is derived from a sense of motion. Both a sense of motion and a sense of space-time are virtually indistinguishable from one another.
The tricky part is the false belief that a clock measures stuff or rather a thing called time, when in fact clocks and watches are basically circular rulers that do not measure anything at all, but instead demonstrate motion. A clock is circular so that a radial arm can mechanically rotate along the ruler continuously, forever denoting a particular position upon the ruler at any given time. Rulers, clocks, and watches, are simply objects with marks displayed at regular intervals, that have been endlessly replicated or reproduced, and then disseminated amongst a populace in order to provide that populace with a common reference point. Rulers, clocks, and watches, are just other forms of mapping our experience–similar to geographical maps–whereby the marks on a ruler or clock are no different than lines of latitude or longitude. Rulers, clocks, and watches, are tools of coordination that we have created and objectified, to improve or at least alter our collective functionality. We could just as well be using watermelons–as opposed to rulers–to measure the dimensions of any given object; for instance, your flat-screen TV might be four watermelons wide and two high. The problem with this, however, is that the size of watermelons isn’t as consistent as a ruler that has been perfectly replicated over and over and over again; one watermelon might be bigger or smaller than the next or, that is to say, most watermelons differ in size. Hence your flat-screen TV, with one watermelon, might be four wide and two high, while with another watermelon the same flat-screen TV might be 3.5 wide and 1.75 high. The dimensions of any given object (or phenomenon) are nevertheless solely determined by comparing that object to another, whether it’s man-made or not.
The only certainties are that conditions change spatially–stuff, in relation to other stuff, moves–and conditions change qualitatively–one object or one form might deteriorate, transform, or what have you.
Notably, language is similar rulers, clocks, watches, and maps, insofar as language itself is just another tool of coordination, just another map or set of coordinates derived from imaginary lines or arbitrary marks, that lends itself to the sense of separate or distinct entities within existence.
It is also important to note that, for each and every tool of coordination that we have created or stumbled upon and effectively utilize, there is always space in between the lines, the marks, the letters, the words, et cetera, that is left usually unacknowledged. That is to say that existence or reality is continuous; and that these marks, lines, and apparent divisions are not actually borders, boundaries, or limitations, but are instead actual difference of continuity.
Each word, each letter, each symbol, is basically one notch on a ruler.
Brilliant comment. I think that “ruler” is a good analogy to explain the problem of QM and the paradox we don’t understand because the process of measuring is the same process we are creating something new. We are always measuring ourselves with our self created rule(r)s and the result is distorted or curvatured because we have to bow the ruler trying to measure itself.
I would like to hear your comments on my explanations what time really is AEIOU.
https://www.facebook.com/pages/JHORA-Spirit-of-Time/1497070130530007?ref=hl
Post your explanation here!
Expounding on my last comment…
The catch-22 is that explanations are necessarily insufficient, incomplete, or partial if even somewhat accurate representations.
Letters, words, symbols, aren’t that different from, say, a painting or an image. For example, the words ‘a tree’ do not functionally differ from this photo (http://www.davey.com/media/1001/home-tree.png?width=960&height=520&quality=80&mode=crop). Both the photo and the words are images. The only difference is that the words themselves (‘a tree’) are of a greater level of abstraction. Furthermore, if one were to compare the words (‘a tree’) instead to this image (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/eb/Ash_Tree_-_geograph.org.uk_-_590710.jpg), one would realize that the words facilitate a different kind of functionality because the words (‘a tree’) effectively remove the grass, the fence, the forest, and the sky from the picture, so to speak. Hence, in some cases, I can focus or direct your attention much more precisely than using a different kind of image with the use of words, instead of, say, a photo, a painting, or a drawing.
The issue with language, however, is that words generate artificial, abstract boundaries or a false sense of boundary. For instance, a tree has leaves, branches, a stump, and roots, but where does the leaf end and the branch begin? Where does the stump end and the roots begin? Again, existence is continual and therefore all boundaries are artificial, abstract, or conceptual.
Likewise, an entire tree can be plucked from the ground, yet a tree cannot exist without nutrients acquired from its environment, from the soil or, in the case of hydroponics, from the solution. A tree might be a distinct entity. A tree might possess a particular form that is independent from its so-called surroundings. However, a tree is not self-sufficient. In fact, nothing, no thing, no particular, is actually self-sufficient. Every thing owes its existence as a thing to other things.
[CORRECTION]
“The catch-22 is that explanations are necessarily insufficient, incomplete, or partial, if representational.”
Thanks!
I love this post. This puts into words what I gut feel is correct, in a way the belief that we are separate beings by nature of having a body is what keeps us isolated, I have always thought this. We long for connection, it is a universal longing and we have a culture of isolation and separation. Your thought are so eloquently expressed.
Thank you Leslie. The Truth cannot help but resonate with those with a yearning for enlightenment; whether it be consciously or subconsciously. God bless. 🙂
Excellently put. It’s usually to hard to put material aside and try to experience the Oneness of it all, but every now and then I get it. The experience continues to evolve. Thanks Stephen.
Your explanation was amazing and insightful. I can not disagree with a single thing you said. And although I am just now starting to wrap my brain around it, I think that it is the next step in human evolution when we can truly understand and harness this reality.
Great insight, enjoyed reading.
I like it.. 🙂
stole my thoughts…i thought i was insane
Hi Tina. As dear old Gandhi said, “even in a minority of one, the Truth is still the truth”. Don’t you worry at all, you’re perfectly sane in an insane world. You were just misled for a while. 🙂
What can I do with this information? I’m happy that this has empowered and freed people but it has just stricken me with an inexplicable fear
Hello Liam. I’d suggest pondering on the Truth until it is perfectly understood. After all, it is all that is Real. As Arthur Schopenhauer said, “All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident. I’d say you are somewhere between second and third. It’s all good news, really.
—
stage 4: the emptiness behind all phenomenons and concepts(the buddha) so: speaking is silver – silence is golden
stage 5: all you need is love, love your neighbour(the beatles, jc)
The christian idea of Father, Son & Holy Spirit is very similar to E,m & c(²) in RT, to Energy, Wave and Particle in QM, to I,U &R in Electricity and as Server, Client and Ethernet in IT.
The “Ether” is the same idea as the Akasha or as the 5th element and we have to respect the coincidence that we created a technical ethernet to connect the Internet as we are as DNA-beings already interconnected by biophotones and light.
“Energy(anc.greek ἐν-en „inner“ und ἔργον-ergon „effect“) is an INDIRECTLY OBSERVED quantity in physics. Energy is an IDEA, like “God”. No one has seen Energy so far, like God. Both are assumed to be everywhere and everything and can change forms. Pure Energy is nothing – like Emptyness in Buddhism.
The idea of Energy follows the logic: “As there is an effect – there must be a cause”. When we think so, we have to respect the phenomenons of Quantum Physics that show: Cause and effect – like question and answer – are entangled by our minds. It takes onlyy our intention, our will and time to create matter by consciousness out of nothing.
To understand what Sciences and Physics really are, we have to see the timeline in spirituality and to understand:
Our story=His(s)tory in/as Philosophy, Theology and Sciences => Spirituality
Krishna/Arjuna/Egypt/Babylon/Judaism/Old Testament: 1st Realm-Father, Having violence problems(an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth…) >Primary school
Buddha/JC/New Testament/ProphetM: 2nd Realm-Son: Explaining and trying to solve violence and social problems(Unconditional Love, Left cheek-right cheek, Zirkat, Ramadan, Charity…) >Secondary school
Sciences/3rd Testament: 3rd Realm-Holy Spirit: Teaching creation as „ Consciousness is forming Energy to Matter”, Holy Trinity in various forms in Physics: E=mc² in RT, E as Wave or Particle in QM, I=U/R in Electricity.
Neurosciences, Psychology, DNA+Biophotones >High School
We need a paradigm shift in sciences to stop seperating from theology while theology has no problem to accept sciences. Pure Energy is as metaphysical as the Zero or the Infinite. When we allow scientists to present sciences of nature as something objective and measurable we allow them to fool humanity completely, because we are always measuring with our self created scales. Measuring ourselves without “knowing who we really are” implies distorted(or curvatured) results. This is what the “Implicite Order” is really about.
Being pure Energy (as Theory) we can see ourselves absolute logically either as Wave(Idea) or as an Particle. There is no problem in QM – the only problem is how we look at it. The distance – and the difference – to connect RT with QM is only in our head. The solution is very easy:
We have to see c² as the QM component in E=mc² and try to calculate gxc instaed of c² to get gravity on board. My intuition says: We must multiply a gravitational wave with a light wave following the idea of John Cramer of the Transactional Interpretation of QM(TIQM) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transactional_interpretation.
Referring to I=U/R in Electricity: Our energy flow > I is the result of our full potential > U divided by our resistance > R to accept our responsibilty for being a Co-creator.
You can find here more information about what time really is:
https://www.facebook.com/1497070130530007/photos/pb.1497070130530007.-2207520000.1415785711./1538473186389701/?type=1&theater
What are we doing here in this planet ???? What is our mission??? And most important question WHO CREATED GOD?can any one answer?
God is the CREATOR .. God is absolutely other than His creation, for the Creator cannot have the same kind of being as His creation.
” He is Allah, the One and Only; Allah, the Eternal, Absolute; He begetteth not, nor is He begotten And there is none like unto Him. “
no… it is not Allah… how can u be sure among 3000 or more Gods created by the man?? Allah is not god, since muhammad is far late in create this religion.. just all gods from hindus,and other big religions in the world had God with different names and of course, they all are older than the new “Allah”… and whatever the argument… Allah is not god.. because if there is a god like Allah that allows people kill innocents in name of a religion, this “god” is crazy and I’d rather living in hell than living among lunatics and fanatics muslims.
All over the world, currently there is no buddhists killing people in name of buddha, there is no Hindus killing people in name of religion, and so there is no christians and jews killing people in name of a religion.. just muslims, crazy and alienated people. Wake up! or be aware that there is no Ala
All over the world, currently there is no buddhists killing people in name of buddha, there is no Hindus killing people in name of religion, and so there is no christians and jews killing people in name of a religion.. just muslims, crazy and alienated people. Wake up! or be aware that there is no Ala
What world do you live in where Muslims are the only people killing others over their religion? CLEARLY you have forgotten the Holocaust, the Crusades, the Spanish Inquisition (I bet you didn’t expect THEM!), Jews and Arabs firing rockets at each other in Israel/Palestine, Hindus and Muslims killing each other in India and Pakistan, Catholics and Protestants in N. Ireland blowing each other up in the name of Jesus or something, the list goes on – I’m sure if I did some research, I could probably find a case of an atheist killing an agnostic for thinking that there might be a god….
Personally I don’t see how someone can believe in God, yet chastise someone else for doing the same. Never really got into religion myself though, thankfully my parents never forced one upon me.
I am not religious, I am spiritual so I have acceptance for all regardless of form.
I see religion as fear mongering and control of the masses, not as a true way of being accepting and spiritual for integration into the afterlife.
I see it all the time the old attack on the muslims becuase a minority of them are militant in their beleif.
Look at the facts! pretty much every religion has blood on their hands.
Of the 1.6 billion in the world less than 1% of muslims are actually extreamists.
Would you like to be labled for what a minority in your sect. is responsible for??
1. “Energy” is the same idea as “God”. It follows the idea: “If there is an effect there MUST be a cause”…..Pretty stupid idea because WE are all causes and effects as we are all questions and answers. Sciences are also a kind of spirituality, using partially numbers and equations instead of words. Creation happens more or less unconsciously – depending on our state of awakening – while we are asking and wondering and thinking of mysteries instaed of giving collective answers. Our biggest – more or less – unconscious collective answer is the Universe. Universe is a self explaining word beacause it means: (we go) versus(towards) ONE.
2. Religion is not fear mongering – Religion is empty and filled with prejudices. We are all personally and individually responsible for objects, subjects or ideas we are afraid of. There is no one to be blamed for nothing on this palnet for a completely self responsible and conscious being. Conspiracy theory is absurd, it is our contemporary habit of the witch-hunt in the middle age. There is nothing to be afraid of than our mind and our thoughts when they are becoming negative.
The one and only, the eternal……..Sorry but this is exactly the idea of “Brahman” in Vedic philosophy.
We are here to find out who we really are by transforming our ego-self(the son, the body) by consciousness rising to the holy spirit into our higher self(our soul, our personal “father”) to learn what our calling is to serve humanity with unconditional love and to create consciously instread of creating unconsciously. We are here to find out what time really is and to explore the Universe by WARP drive as it is already written by our science fiction prophets. Sciences will become our new “religion” because it bases on the idea of “energy”, which is the same idea as “god” but more precise, calculable and peaceful than our theology-religions. God and energy are created by us, out of emptyness, because we ask questions instead of seeing humanity as one and giving collective answers. More information here:
https://www.facebook.com/pages/JHORA-Spirit-of-Time/1497070130530007?ref=hl
Man created God.
Our mission is to know our-self, if you know yourself then you will know that you are all. or our mission is to get freedom from time and space.
i think you’re right. i think the purpose is to rediscover ourselves (which is really our self; singular) and to know and understand that our essence is god (in a nonreligious sense).
Our essence(akasha) – in nonreligious and very Einsteinian sense – is energy, “God” is from and in Theology. The reason and definition for “god” and energy is the same: Where there is an effect there must be a cause.
Both, “god” as well as energy, are metaphysical – from beyond, afterlife, kingdom come…
I think it was Kant who demonstrated that cause and effect isn’t derived from experience, but rather experience is derived from the notion of cause and effect. In other words, cause and effect is significant–not because experience actually unfolds in the manner of causes and effects but–because the notion allows us to attain understanding of our experience. For instance, one billiard ball hitting another could be said to be the cause of the second billiard ball’s momentum; However, it could be said that the cue stick is the cause of the first billiard ball’s momentum and, as such, is also the cause of the second billiard ball’s momentum; Nevertheless, it could also be said that the human yielding the cue stick is the cause of the cue stick’s momentum. Do you see where I’m going with this? Again, the notion that cause and effect–similar to the notions of space and time–is significant to achieving understanding of experience. That which we experience is derived from these notions–cause and effect, space and time–not the other way around.
Gianfranco Fronzi, I’m not sticking with these ideas, I’ve got plenty of ideas including the ones in this articles too. I just meant before there are some facts that are true and that we can see : for example the earth turning around the sun, the moon, turning around the earth, and I don’t think those things are immaterials. As far as I know, we went one the moon, and today we just lent on a comet with a robot… This is reality too, and this is not immaterial. You know what I mean ?
I am not saying this article is totally wrong, and the idea is actually pretty cool, just as usual there is nuances that we don’t have to forget about. And for me, this article is skipping some of it. Anyway, the only real thing that makes me slightly believe to this theory is the changing behavior of an electron weither there is an observer or not…. This is quite weird and interesting, I reckon, hard to picture though… 😉
Thanks to all concerned for a lively discussion.
Wolfgang Pauli wrote the following to Carl Jung:
“For the invisible reality, of which we have small pieces of evidence in both quantum physics and the psychology of the unconscious, a symbolic psychophysical unitary language must ultimately be adequate, and this is the far goal which I actually aspire. I am quite confident that the final objective is the same, independent of whether one starts from the psyche (ideas) or from physis (matter). Therefore, I consider the old distinction between materialism and idealism as obsolete.”
We find an intriguing parallel to the foregoing in David Chalmers:
“We can also find information embodied in conscious experience. The pattern of color patches in a visual field, for example, can be seen as analogous to that of pixels covering a display screen. Intriguingly, it turns out that we find the same information states embodied in conscious experience and in underlying physical processes in the brain. The three-dimensional encoding of color spaces, for example, suggests that the information state in a color experience correspond directly to an information state in the brain. We might even regard the two states as distinct aspects of a single information state, which is simultaneously embodied in both physical processing and conscious experience.”
And in Bohm & Hiley:
“One may then ask what is the relationship between the physical and the mental processes? The answer that we propose here is that there are not two processes. Rather, it is being suggested that both are essentially the same.”
For over 40 years, now, I’ve been laboring to see whether these ideas can be made to work vis-à-vis quantum theory.
http://wordassociation1.net/qcindex.htm
Happily, spouting off about these notions no longer consigns one to the lunatic fringe, thanks in large measure to an article in ‘Nature’ on “The physics of life: The dawn on quantum biology.”
http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110615/full/474272a.html
So that’s kind of interesting.
Brian,
Yes you are correct, and a very intelligent answer. Have you read the Jung Pauli Conjecture book, worth a read (bit heavy duty stuff but you will be ok). Yes essentially the physical is a subset (or part representation or projection of the conciousness quantum field (re the biology etc). So in effect you have to look at the whole thing from the other direction, but still all one and the same thing.
But then the whole thing is then very difficult to describe or define if we only have a physical point of view/reference/descriptive capabilities. Which is when you end up with analogies and religions etc.
which is also very difficult to start to get your head around unless you have been down the proverbial Rabbit hole (as with Jung and Pauli).
Jung was also correct about syncronicity.
Will have a look at your sites – I think you will find your work has not been in vain (unlike with most Theoretical Physicists).
Also worth a read :-
http://www.amazon.com/Pieces-Dark-Nick-Sambrook-ebook/dp/B00J9F0818/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1416068555&sr=8-1&keywords=Nick+Sambrook&pebp=1416068556064
https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/427841
Thanks Nick
Changing consciousness changes reality.
“Modern day science, especially quantum physics, has been catching up to ancient mysticism and concepts that are/were so deeply ingrained in various cultures throughout the ancient world.” The problem with science is that it does not go as far as mystical traditions that postulate that a greater Mind than our ego-intellect mind exists, Not wanting to sound religious, science is misleading people in the erroneous belief that through thinking about their desires they will achieve happiness. In fact they will achieve the opposite in that way. Mystics talk about changing your thinking from Ego into Spirit basis which means emulating a compassionate, omnipotent being and achieving the mind set first of total egolessness before imposing your desires on the universe….because our world that we have created in fact of greed and malevolence is based in our present day ego based thinking. According to mystics who came before us and laid out the path to take to think with the other Mind takes hard work and practice and does not occur through intellectual discourse at all. In fact intellectualism and information need to be forfeited to access the other state of Mind.
http://www.wired.com/2014/06/the-new-quantum-reality/
In my humble opinion the title “Consciousness Creates Reality” shows that scientists do not know neither what (who) “Consciousness” is nor what “Reality” is, but from the text it is obvious that they think that Reality is this material universe of motion. We human beings are Consciousness, we are mental beings who are living in cosmic vacuum tube of invisibility and projecting our creative desires mentally though thinking, imagining and dreaming. Consciousness is awareness of spiritual “Being” – omnipresence, omnipotence and omniscience. This material universe is product of thoughts and is pure illusion except for our senses which are deceiving us by dividing ONE cause into two equal and opposite effects. The only Reality is Consciousness itself and this material universe is simulation of the Reality. In simple words, what we are thinking is electrically recorded in mater – our physical body is electric record of our thoughts!
We are still on the level on electric awareness of our senses (we are trusting our senses) and we are expanding slowly into cosmic consciousness of our Mind who knows the truth and can correct deception of our senses. All scientific concepts are product of so called “Empirical Knowledge” which is based on sense observation – on deception – and are logically wrong!
Instead of going deeper into this subject, please let me give you a citation:
“MODERN SCIENCE IS TRAGIC
The ultimately supreme need of the human race at this stage of unfolding is the discovery of the existence and identity of a comprehensible God by methods and processes which will meet the requirements and standards demanded in the laboratories of science as well as within the heart and consciousness of man.
The tragedy of modern science is that it has already made this supreme discovery but is not aware of it. Because of the present-day misconception of the universe, which the Creator built in the image of Cosmic imagining, and of God Himself, Whom religion has pictured as some kind of angry god of wrath who wreaks vengeance upon so-called sinners–instead of conceiving Him as a God of Light and Love–fear has been created by man which leads to war and the preying of man upon man, and is the dominant note upon which our civilization has been constructed. As long as fear dominates the human race instead of love, it will create the disunity which is characteristic of its many religions. When the day comes that fear leaves man and love enters, the age of slaughter of man by man will end and the age of character will begin.
In human justice, we are not blaming religion alone, for science and religion are father and mother mates–science being the father. All down the ages, man’s discoveries in science have progressed your civilization to the point where a man’s world is its resultant effect. Man has always been master of the world and man’s nature to conquer has always suppressed the love nature of woman.
Deeper still than science, which should have discovered the God of Love (BALANCE), or religion, which created a god of fear and wrath, is the basic cause of man’s self-made troubles–and that is MAN, himself, who strayed from God’s Natural Law at the dawn of Consciousness and has continued to do so to this very moment.
Alexis Carrel was right in saying that all of man’s institutions–and these include government, industry, education and home relations–were man-governed and out of balance with themselves and with each other and must, therefore, all be changed to obey the laws of Nature.
This is why we keep making the same statement over and over for your attention: “God will work WITH you but not FOR you”. It is also why you must understand the law of rhythmic balanced interchange between all opposite pairs in Nature.
We will continue herein, to give universal science a clearly delineated road map into space to clarify the mysteries which it has for so long been unable to fathom.
When the day comes that it does so, a cohesive, unified and forever enduring civilization will emerge, resulting in the transcendency of man from his present lowly status to that final goal of his Creator’s intent where he can knowingly say, “I and my Father are ONE”.”
This is taken from the Phoenix Journal 37: “Science of the Cosmos” and I recommend all of you who really want truth about Man and Cosmos to read Phoenix Journals 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 and 74. You can find all of them in pdf format on http://www.abundanthope.net (there is a link on left side).
Truth is not in science!
I proved experimentally that atom is light ring spinning around a black hole centered by stillness (you tube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gcVzxDdVqbA).
Love&Joy
Dr. Ilija Lakicevic
Beautiful comment – thanks for posting.
@Ilija
The scientists are only unconscious of what thes are really doing and talking about. There is no spirituality which is more precise than physics. The core problem in physics is the definition of E, energy and c as speed of light, c is light with speed of light.
The christian idea of Father, Son & Holy Spirit is similar to E,m & c(²) in RT, to Energy, Particle and Wave in QM, to I,U &R in Electricity and as Server, Client and Ethernet in IT.
The “Ether” is the same idea as the Akasha or as the 5th element and we have to respect the coincidence that we created a technical ethernet to connect the technical Internet as we are as DNA-beings already interconnected by biophotones and light.
“Energy(anc.greek ἐν-en „inner“ und ἔργον-ergon „effect“) is an INDIRECTLY OBSERVED quantity in physics. Energy is an IDEA, like “God”. No one has seen Energy so far, like God. Both are assumed to be everywhere and everything and can change forms. Pure Energy is nothing – like Emptyness in Buddhism.
The idea of Energy follows the logic: “As there is an effect – there must be a cause” let us call this cause energy. When we think so, we have to respect the phenomenons of Quantum Physics that show: Cause and effect – like question and answer – are entangled by our minds. It takes only our intention, our will and time to create matter by consciousness out of nothing.
To understand what Sciences and Physics really are, we have to see the timeline in spirituality and to understand:
Our story=His (s)tory in/as Philosophy, Theology and Sciences => Spirituality
Krishna/Arjuna/Egypt/Babylon/Judaism/Old Testament: 1st Realm-Father, Having violence problems(an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth…) >Primary school
Buddha/JC/New Testament/ProphetM: 2nd Realm-Son: Explaining and trying to solve violence and social problems(Unconditional Love, Left cheek-right cheek, Zirkat, Ramadan, Charity…) >Secondary school
Sciences/3rd Testament: 3rd Realm-Holy Spirit: Teaching creation as „ Consciousness is forming Energy to Matter”, Holy Trinity in various forms in Physics: E=mc² in RT, E as Wave or Particle in QM, I=U/R in Electricity.
Neurosciences, Psychology, DNA+Biophotones >High School
We need a paradigm shift in sciences to stop seperating from theology while theology has no problem to accept sciences. Pure Energy is as metaphysical as the Zero or the Infinite. When we allow scientists to present sciences of nature as something objective and measurable we allow them to fool humanity completely, because we are always measuring with our self created scales. Measuring ourselves without “knowing who we really are” implies distorted(or curvatured) results.
Being pure Energy (as Theory) we can see ourselves absolute logically either as Wave(Idea) or as an Particle. There is no problem in QM – the only problem is how we look at it. The distance – and the difference – to connect RT with QM is only in our head.
Referring to I=U/R in Electricity: Our energy flow > I is the result of our full potential > U divided by our resistance > R to accept our responsibilty for being a Co-creator.
You can find here more information about what time really is:
https://www.facebook.com/1497070130530007/photos/pb.1497070130530007.-2207520000.1415785711./1538473186389701/?type=1&theater
Can you elaborate specifically on what you mean by this:
“When we allow scientists to present sciences of nature as something objective and measurable we allow them to fool humanity completely, because we are always measuring with our self created scales. Measuring ourselves without “knowing who we really are” implies distorted results.”
No, i did this already several times. If you can’t imagine a flexible and bowed/bent/curvatured ruler where one end of the ruler measures the other end of the ruler i can’t help you.
Our consciousness is the creative element in creation. The other two, energy and matter, are ruled by consciousness. Consciousness is forming energy to matter. When we try to explore and to measure the Universe with RT and QM we try to measure our consciousness with our consciousness – Foolish
The spiral(of DNA) can be seen as the analogy to our evolution of endless measuring and bowing.
I was just trying to understand what you had said. The metaphor was helpful in regard to that.
I think the fundamental role of consciousness has been obvious for a long time, ever since someone asked about qualia. Why do we experience a colour when our eyes are bombarded with light of a certain wavelength? The only answer, in my opinion, is that the experience is a property of consciousness. A particular trace in consciousness is activated by the transmutation of physical energy to the energy of consciousness.
Doesn’t it have at least something to do with the human eye? We see colour for one of the same reasons we don’t see infrared-, gamma-, ultraviolet-, and x-rays, in addition to micro-waves and radio-waves.
God is a great scientist!
The quote about not being able to solve problems from the same level of consciousness they were created comes from Einstein 😉
Louise, so many times I’ve wondered if that quote actually came from Einstein. If you know it, I would love to have the source where Einstein said that.
alice calaprice speculates that it could be paraphrased from this: http://books.google.ca/books?id=AIHgK-p6mhgC&q=%22It+is+easier+to+denature+plutonium+than+it+is+to+denature+the+evil+spirit+of+man%22&pg=PA385&redir_esc=y#v=snippet&q=%22a%20new%20type%20of%20thinking%20is%20essential%20if%20mankind%20is%20to%20survive%20and%20move%20to%20higher%20levels.%22&f=false
The quote has never been traced back to Einstein and seems to be a modern corruption of a combination of quotes – On the internet, people constantly appropriate famous names to give credence to their own thinking.
The following quotes could be the origin:
“Our situation is not comparable to anything in the past. It is impossible, therefore, to apply methods and measures which at an earlier age might have been sufficient. We must revolutionize our thinking, revolutionize our actions, and must have the courage to revolutionize relations among nations of the world. Cliches of yesterday will no longer do today, and will, no doubt, be hopelessly out of date tomorrow.”
[Einstein (1948) ” A Message to Intellectuals”. Source: ‘Albert Einstein’ Green J. (Ed.), 2003 (p. 52)]
“Problems are best solved not on the level where they appear to occur but on the next level above them….Problems are best solved by transcending them and looking at them from a higher viewpoint. At the higher level, the problems automatically resolve themselves because of that shift in point of view, or one might see there was no problem at all.”
[David R. Hawkins. 2009. Healing and Recovery. Sedona, AZ; Veritas Publishing, p. 176.]
Also, the ‘Russell-Einstein Manifesto’ of 9 July 1959, issued with the same sentiment by Bertrand Russell on behalf of eleven signatories (including Albert Einstein who had signed shortly before his death on 18 April 1959, three months prior to its release) – which has the phrase:
“We have to learn to think in a new way.”
The context of that quote, regarding nuclear militarism, is here:
“We shall try to say no single word which should appeal to one group rather than to another. All, equally, are in peril, and, if the peril is understood, there is hope that they may collectively avert it. We have to learn to think in a new way. We have to learn to ask ourselves, not what steps can be taken to give military victory to whatever group we prefer, for there no longer are such steps; the question we have to ask ourselves is: what steps can be taken to prevent a military contest of which the issue must be disastrous to all parties?”
[Web Reference: http://www.pugwash.org/about/manifesto.htm%5D
Logical mind must be kept aside when thinking of spirituality. Thanks
Spirituality is logical.
I strongly believe this is the solution we have to work on, and comlete it before AI comes. And im sorry that won’t happen in my lifetime.
Consciousness is the one thing that none of us can deny.
It is existence itself.
Consciousness is neither born nor does it die.
How can life die?
Consciousness does not exist apart from you,
Hence you cannot find it.
With the mind nobody has ever been able to know the truth.
Without the mind anybody can know the truth, because the mind is the only barrier.
The mind must cease for the truth to be.
Truth has no name, and truth is not confined in any system of thought.
Truth is not a theory, a theology, a philosophy.
Truth is the experience of that which is.
Truth is not intellectual or emotional; truth is existential.
Modern physics, in the hands of Albert Einstein, has turned almost into mysticism.
Nobody has noted the fact, because mystics don’t understand modern physics and the physicists do not care about the mystics.
The mystics have always experienced that they are one, but nobody has listened to them.
Perhaps man was not mature enough to understand the depth of their declaration.
The mystics have simply expressed the oneness of all.
Physicists go into detail.
Albert Einstein, especially, was the first scientist to come to the conclusion that time is the fourth dimension of matter.
Matter has three dimensions, the fourth dimension is invisible and that is time, but it is not separate from matter.
Modern physics has declared – without declaring the death of matter – that there is no matter at all.
With the disappearance of matter and with the death of God, only one energy remains in the whole cosmos.
Now time and space cannot be two.
They have to be expressions of one energy.
Spacetime.
Consciousness s not anywhere else, it is exactly where you are this moment.
Life knows only one moment, and that is the present.
Life knows only one space, and that is here.
Now and here: these two words are the most significant words in the human language;
They represent reality.
Osho
There is only one thing to understand: We are a – creative – process (while) measuring ourselves – That’s impossible….. The result will be distorted or – curvatured…. What we believe as a process of “measurement” is – “control”, our “self control”…….Our – distorted/curvatured – space-time control is our self (un)limited spacetime navigation…….
Consciousness – being free of thought – is the door to knowing.
Knowing is not an achievement, it is a discovery.
We don’t have to achieve it,
We have to uncover it.
It is ever present within us.
In knowing, there is no thought, there is only seeing.
Hence the path of thinking never takes one to knowing.
You can only think about something you have known, but when you have known it, there is nothing to think about.
That is the dilemma, the predicament.
That is the basic puzzle.
A person who knows never thinks because there is no need to think.
What you know, you know.
There is no need to think about it.
Only a person who does not know who is ignorant, thinks.
But how can you think about what you don’t know?
A blind man can be knowledgeable about light, but he knows nothing of light, he has not experienced it.
He can collect all kinds of information about light, he can argue, philosophize, systematize, he can write great treatises on light, but he has not tasted the joy of light, he has not seen even a single ray of light.
He has not seen a rainbow, the colours of the flowers, the wings of a butterfly.
He has not seen the green trees, he has not seen the stars, the sun, the moon.
He has missed all that.
And what he has accumulated is simply rubbish.
It is better to be ignorant and have eyes than to be very knowledgeable about light and be blind.
Osho
Consciousness doesn’t creates reality,
Consciousness is reality.
It is Life Itself!
This realization doesn’t come from the imagination, the mind or hearsay,
but from knowing yourself…
Wake up!
The only way to be connected with existence is to go inwards, because there at the centre you are still connected.
Your connection with the universe is of consciousness.
You cannot see it, so you have to go deep down with great awareness, watchfulness, witnessing, and you will find the connection.
Consciousness is the highest form of energy.
Osho
<3
very nice
Define consciousness, reality, life, self and energy.
From my experience, people who make statements like those won’t define the given terms lol
So, in your opinion, ‘time’ is nothing more or less than the invisible fourth dimension of matter that isn’t separate from matter?
Aliens have been involved in human DNA manipulations throughout most of human existence and may have been the ones behind the “Adam and Eve” experiment that created us. Ready to discover more about the aliens?
http://www.blue-planet-project.com/
And illegal aliens aren’t Mexicans, they’re extraterrestrials… and have taken over the world and restructured our thought process to relate this term to Mexicans and not them… Hahahah. Nah, I’m only joking. Anything is possible in this life we call “reality.”
If a tree falls in the forest, and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound? A tape recorder would provide you with the answer… Yes. However, thin of the realm of possibilities… Is the tree falling actually a dream? One person’s dream, where the noise is merely a thought… The thought of this is depicted as reality, when it could be a false reality to begin with… Individuals seek enlightenment in an attempt to understand the meaning of life… the purpose of our existence… Who is to say that all the years I have lived are, or are not, a few hours, minutes, or even seconds compiled in a dream? People say “life flashes before their eyes,” and have no idea how to explain the truth of their words. Traveling at the speed of sound is quick… The speed of light even quicker… Could the speed of thought be as slow or as fast we think it to be? The mind is said to be the most powerful tool in all the universe. Perhaps it is misconstrued, where the universe is the most powerful tool in the mind. How big is the universe in which you live in? These are all thoughts… And most likely shall remain thoughts, since none of these thoughts could be proven in any reality…
recognizing the tool to shape reality is the first step
Next comes the details:
http://abstractionphysics.net/pmwiki/index.php
Another great article, Arjun.
‘The audience completes the artwork…50% of it…by observing the piece..Marcel Duchamp.
Read the Kybalion for an ancient and very good answer.
Learn the basics before you explore the questions.
It is Clear, our world, our galaxi, in fact the whole universe, would not exist if we were not there to observe it, If ever, robots would take over the world and eliminate every single human beeing, apearently universe would stop to exist because in the nano world, a particle only does or better said “is” what it needs to be or do when it is observed by humans.
While I go along with this to a certain degree so far, I can’t help but wonder why babies and children are historically abused when they cannot possibly be held responsible for creating this in their own minds.
Our brains are nothing more then receivers, you dont create the world around it or what happens, just as little as you could change the course of a movie you are watching, and for the movie you would like a dvd player, you need your brain to watch and experiance the movie of live on earth.
omfg what a load of romantic pseudo wishful “thinkingness” that sounds very thought provoking on the surface but ends up being just a long refutable postmodern mash-up of disparate non-linkable ideas. grow up…it’s meaningless..I wish this article was true but it’s really not no matter what vantage point you look at if from:(
PS – take this from someone that really thinks holistically about possibilities of what is real and what is not. As much as I admire Deleuze, have a look at this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fashionable_Nonsense
To add something more as to not just sound like a troll, you confuse science’s purpose and tools with a different domain – the spiritual/metaphysical, it’s comparing apples with oranges – yes, in this case they both involve human understanding but the flavor you get from one is quite different from the other. No serious scientifically minded individual will adhere to this as it does not stand for what science offers: understanding through objective truth. You follow completely the opposite rule here, interpreting what scientist said as you wanted it to – aligning it to you own non scientific point of view. You basically what science is all about for your own interpretation – which is fine, as long as you don’t claim it as Truth. “Physicists Admit The Universe Is Immaterial, Mental & Spiritual” – no they don’t, nowhere near that but you spin it so that’s what your readers will get from your article…honestly this is totally not the way to go when you deal with things that could really change people lives just because you use nice words and concepts because you rely on their nativity and they are not scientifically literate. If you could at least admit that you are just speculating it would be a good step forward really for your own sake first of all and for the sake of others who read this article too. Much more enlightening. You only hint at it by saying that “we might not understand the extent of this connection, and in most cases scientists can’t even explain it. However they are, and have been observed time and time again.” – you are implying the wrong fact by twisting the words. In this case, if scientists cannot explain something does it automatically cross to the spiritual realm? Since when? Anyway, I suggest you check out Karl Popper’s interview about decoding Truth and Science! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AsFdH0Q7RSs Maybe you will understand better what you are doing wrong and correct it. But seeing your spins I highly doubt it…nonetheless, I only hope.
There is nothing more spiritual and metaphysical than the idea of Energy.
“The word energy derives from the Ancient Greek: ἐνέργεια energeia “activity, operation”,[3] which possibly appears for the first time in the work of Aristotle in the 4th century BC.”(Wikipedia)
The logic behind energy is: “Where there is an impact or an effect – there must be a cause or a reason” This IDEA of a cause or a reason was named energy. Energy is absolutely nothing objective and substantial. It is the same idea like “god” as a reason for all. All sciences are as well spirituality as theology, developed by our collective human spirit and not detected as “laws of nature” Sciences are creative spirituality with numbers and equations.
It is due to the arrogance of scientifical minded people to claim sciences as something objective and the kindness of spiritual people to tolerate their confusion. 🙂
Since QM(“If quantum mechanics hasn’t profoundly shocked you, you haven’t understood it yet.” – Niels Bohr) we could know that there is no “objective material nature” without us as the observer. Serious scientifically minded individuals like Max Planck state:
“I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from consciousness. We cannot get behind consciousness. Everything that we talk about, everything that we regard as existing, postulates consciousness.”
“We have no right to assume that any physical laws exist, or if they have existed up to now, that they will continue to exist in a similar manner in the future.”
“Science cannot solve the ultimate mystery of nature. And that is because, in the last analysis, we ourselves are part of nature and therefore part of the mystery that we are trying to solve.”
I think it’s much more arrogant when spiritual people think they understand something as truth and live their whole life believing in absolute values attributed to something as elusive as the pseudo-scientific facts they present as truths, confusing others more in the process. Scientist are usually very unclear about their knowledge, that’s why their minds are probably much more open to possibilities than yours. No scientist claims anything as being TRUTH because their claims are always subjected to peer review/critic.
It’s you dino_saur to claim truth and objective and scientific facts and absolute values. This is your projection, because you think so. I don’t even use such words. What i do is presenting ideas, passing on information, thinking and believing.
Mind matters, if we want or not, so if you think your mind does not matter, o.k. – i surrender, you shall be right – your mind does not matter.
Please answer one question please: “What do you think you are made of ” ?
Christian, you read only half of what I wrote; read again my posts, maybe you will understand better. I never said science is 100 percent accurate, though it tends to be, that would be the scope or purpose – as in scientific truth – as opposed to art for example which doesn’t have a delineation between fact and fiction. Do you understand what peer review means? Nonetheless, as for your question, what am I made of – it’s too general to answer. I am made of a lot of things, from thoughts to atoms to my mobile phone (abstraction) or stardust. Either pick one of those or all or next time, ask a better question.
sorry dino_saur, now you’re playing with words(…”not 100% accurate”….) YOU claimed objective truth, what i never did, but you accused me. that’s not fair and no basis for a discussion.
to cite you: “………you confuse science’s purpose and tools with a different domain – the spiritual/metaphysical, it’s comparing apples with oranges – yes, in this case they both involve human understanding but the flavor you get from one is quite different from the other. No serious scientifically minded individual will adhere to this as it does not stand for what science offers: understanding through objective truth………
my answer was: “there is nothing more spiritual and metaphysical in physics than energy”. all the words and numbers we use to describe physics are metaphysical, their origin is a mental one, an inspirational. the purpose of spirituality is the same as sciences: to understand creation and historically sciences originate from theology
Hans-Peter Dürr the german physicist, assistant and successor of Heisenberg at the Max PIanck Institute for Physics and Astrophysics in Munich wrote a book: “Physics do also speak in analogies only: The new relationship between natural science and religion”(Original: “Auch die Wissenschaft spricht nur in Gleichnissen: Die neue Beziehung zwischen Religion und Naturwissenschaften, Herder 2004). Religions and sciences are teaching the same story – the story of creation and the Universe and they are only using different languages.
To accept or to deny this, depends on our individual mindset.
the first paradigm to set up the mind is: “are we spiritual beings having a human experience, or are we human beings having a spiritual experience”.
the second paradigmn is: do i believe in the concept of a soul which is different from my mindset. for some people we are like 1.hardware and 2.software, 1.body and 2.consciousness. for other people we are like 1.soul, 2.body and 3.consciousness, like 1.developer, 2. hardware. 3. software
if our mindsets are not according in this two basic paradigms any discussion is pointless.
Truth is subjective and proof is that science will NEVER be able to BE ME NOW AS I EXPERIENCE what it is that I experience. And my experiences are more psychological and psychic than five physical senses. You cannot replicate a unit of consciousness for each is unique and has its own individuality. Objectivity will ultimately be proven non-existent, as the concept relies on the false assumption that matter affects matter. Matter is instantaneous and not continuous. Matter is formed by consciousness as it enters what we call the physical plane.
The truth isn’t entirely subjective. The truth is objective in the sense that the word, the noun, the concept–truth–is functional in ways that are hard to demarcate precisely. We’re discussing the truth right now, and at least in that sense it’s objective.
You shouldn’t feel threatened by science. Science is a tool, a particular practice, and a particular description of the world–of our experience–that allows us to do and to achieve wonderful things.
“Matter does not effect matter.” What do you mean by this?
“Matter is formed by consciousness as it enters what we call the physical plane.” Can you elaborate?!
I think there is no one here who is threatened by sciences. My experience is that people who see themselves primarily as spiritual beings – living in a physical body – usually don’t disrespect sciences, even the vaticane is absolutely according to sciences. There is only dino_saur who seems to be threatened by mind, consciousness and spirituality. Seeing differences between sciences and theology is a mental and a linguistic problem. It’s our choice to think and speak divisive and to create barriers or see the patterns and analogies. The word “atom” is the greek, “individuum” is latin, the meaning is absolutely the same – indivisible. Each word and each number we use are of spiritual origin, no matter in which context we use it.
The article we’re talking about is “Consciousness Creates Reality” – Physicists Admit The Universe Is Immaterial, Mental & Spiritual.”
O.K. we could discuss if the phrase: “The Universe Is Immaterial, Mental & Spiritual.” is true, because we know from physics that the universe is Energy, waves and matter.
Christian, why would you think I am threatened by mind, consciousness and spirituality? Did I ever say I am against any of these ideas? Not at all. I was just pointing out the clear, in your face flaws of this article. When talking nowadays about atoms, quantum physics, matter, consciousness, etc, I think best would be to get feedback from people that actually study these fields and see what they have to say. If you as a layman have an opinion and state that it is true (such as this article tried to do) you will get counter arguments no matter what. Everyone is free to be as spiritual as they want, there is no problem with that in any way; the problem is with how this article tries to be scientific with spiritual matters, which from a logical standpoint is really flawed and do not make any sense either for real spiritual people or scientifically minded people. It’s like a chaotic soup of terms that don’t match up and no matter what you do or how you play with their proportions, it still tastes bad. My conclusion is that this will remain forever in the realm of pseudo-science unless we really go retrograde and forget everything we ever discovered so far about the universe (and reality in general). But hell, what do I know.
One more doubt related to the title: if you take it as truth it would automatically imply that you can pass through walls for example – if you wanted. Does it ever happen in the reality of the universe we are living in? Did it ever happen? Do you think it will ever happen? My guess is that the confusion lies in conceptualizing the different measurement levels and what they signify: if you take the subatomic scale or the quantum level you could say that yes, a particle can do that under the right conditions. But if you take the atomic scale or even better our lumped atoms that constitute our bodies it will probably never be the case. So, can you disintegrate and re-assemble yourself to pass through walls if you consciously decided? Let me know when that happens and I will retract my skeptic reaction:)
You wrote:
1. “P.S. take this from someone that really thinks holistically about possibilities of what is real and what is not…….”
2.”My conclusion is that this will remain forever in the realm of pseudo-science unless we really go retrograde and forget everything we ever discovered so far about the universe (and reality in general). But hell, what do I know.”
What do you want me to believe now ? 1. or 2. or both ? like “I know nothing but everything better”
Well, the key is not what we know. The key is what we love, whom we love and how many we are willing and capable to love – holisticially – and beyond all sciences. It matters from the “energy as waves” level to resonate, to synchronize and to bundle our individual energies to co-herence as ONE (like the holographic universe in sciences), or if we abuse our energies to seperate from or even to destroy one another.
Dear Dino, I wonder if a non-academic guy can strike a chord through your intuition… my modest attempt through a book / movement : “Love is : A farewell to nuclear arms” … a non-profit venture.. warm regards from Jimmy Shroff
Christian – these topics were debated a million times with no clear 100 percent absolute answer on any side. I find this to be good, as it sets our minds in motion to think about different possibilities. Think about someone that knows everything there is and will ever be, how would life unfold? Would it be as interesting? I tend to think that it is only a matter of different perception, depending on personality and education so yes, you could say that ultimately it might all be subjective but there isn’t a definite absolute claim that cannot be contested by a new theory – again, a good thing we figured out while evolving. You can believe in 1 and 2 in the same time but it would only be a belief, not an absolute unbeatable truth (maybe only for you). This is why everything depends on the vantage point you want to look at it (I guess). Tomorrow (like it happened before) something new will be discovered that would gain sufficient traction in time to be considered valid by fifty percent +1 of the people – although I highly doubt it, these days everyone sticks to their own flavor of knowledge and we just have to accept this if we still want to remain human. Otherwise we go back to totalitarianism or what not. So the point is whether you want to go old school and think you might ever know something for certain (like the fact that mathematically 1+1=2 or maybe you want to go all speculative or even completely nihilistic about such things and invent your own reality system and be comfortable with it. But as it depends on the medium you live and the people you meet, you might just be fine with following the herd or the few so called “spiritual people” or whatever. You can choose what you can think reality is made of, nobody can take your freedom to imagine things. It just matters if you want to discover anything true or not and how much you enjoy really understanding what science or spirituality is all about. If you are the kind of person that relies on intuitions you will miss the logical and the other way around. If you follow both spiritual and scientific you will tend to end up a nihilist in the end as you will not find comfort in any of the two as basically you will tend to prove and/or disprove both sides alternatively by doing a bit of research. So you will end up thinking that life is really meaningless in the end and find some comfort in that as it opens up the best (or optimal) type of freedom: invent your own understanding (like a Marxist inventing his/her own moral universe). So not sure why you would ever insist on energy and stuff like that – for me it is really one of an infinite sea of possibilities. That’s all and I hope it makes sense for you.
the problem, the challenge and the potential solution remains the same: we have to identify the paradigm which is the basic one for us to discuss those topics. Unless we see consciousness not as the primarily responsible element for creation and/of matter and as the self fulfilling prophecy for the phenomenons of creation and the universe any discussion is pointless.
let us do a little thought experiment, can you try to find a solution for the hen-egg problem – in case you don’t know already a solution. what do you think ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1a8pI65emDE
The video is very nice, but this is not the original hen-egg problem any more. The paradigm of what they examine was changed(extended) into an evolutionary chain of animals by mutations and where the mutation is happening. Then they DECIDED to find the mutation first in an egg and now the egg is responsible. The egg answer is also completely disrespecting the wolf-dog mutations done by conscious human choice and breeding technologies. Real scientists would go deeper and start to examine how mutations happen and what(or who) is responsible for mutations.
It is o.k. to extend the scope towards evolution and mutations, but this ends with the same question: did matter and time had a starting point(bigbang), an evolution and evolved to humans with a conscious mind, or was there consciousness before and as a starting point, perhaps something like “god” or consciousness as something eternal and infinite…….. (not as an objective truth, just like another idea and approach)
I can imagine on more solution, just by using a different approach to the problem and a different extension by using and adding these ideas:
“Science cannot solve the ultimate mystery of nature. And that is because, in the last analysis, we ourselves are part of nature and therefore part of the mystery that we are trying to solve. (Max Planck, Quantum Physicist 1931/32”)
and
“No problem can be solved from the same level of consciousness that created it.”
Do you wanna try ?
I think you are really running in circles here and you clearly don’t bother to read at all the links I gave you (I for one did with yours, I am quite familiar with what you are trying to say) but you are still the one who insists I am the stuck one and in what, from all world’s evils – science. Have you bothered to check what David Chalmers is saying and what he did for the study of consciousness? And scientists by the way follow all the possible paths such as studying mutations, patterns and the big bang and all the mysteries of nature, so what do you think you know better than a scientist? I am really confused. Quoting Plank does not mean really understanding the guy. So what are you after really?
the paradigmatic questions – or premises – are: is creation running in circles(of times and dimensions) like: ∞ eternally ? or: has creation a beginning and an end like: singularity as beginning ——> ? as end.
yes, my consciousness is running universes in circles – with a singularity to pass in the center, but i don’t think to know better – this is again out of your head. i’m thinking different. for me consciousness is eternal and attached to a soul, your consciousness seems to have a beginning and an end. in germany dead is: “the moment we must believe”. life is the time we can believe – or not. each of us makes his own decision that’s o.k. but it is no reason to fight against the decisions other people are making. max planck is definitely a scientist who believed in god and confessed to god as a phenomenon “above” or outside the creation sciences were able to express and describe in formulas.
I’ll try one more time for the sake of repetition: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uUfz6oahp2Q – why collective knowledge/truth comes from the sciences. This is why I still have some hope for this website in particular. But to tell you the truth my hopes are steadily fading with the latest articles. Anyway. I am not going to comment anymore on this topic, I understand your point but there is no real truth for me in it. Thanks for a pleasant conversation.
thx, it’s my pleasure. i have no doubt that physics will become our future “religion”, or as i would prefer: language, to travel, to explore and to configurate the universe – but: no fundamentalism please ! religion, psychology, sociology, economics and ecology will all lead to the same conclusion how to get actively to the singularity point. the key to understand what we do through consciousness is that we are already co-creating unconsciously. the evolution of creation/universe is the same as the evolution of our consciousness. the universe does not exist seperated from us – as well as the hen-egg problem does not exist without the creation/creator of the question: what was FIRST ? as if there was a starting point like a singularity+bigbang or “god”)…. the change of paradigm and “thinking different” is to think cyclic. some physicist(penrose: cycles of time/bojowald: the inverted universe) do already think different and singularity is getting more like a transition point than a starting point. exactly like this sign: ∞, a cycle of time on the left, a cycle of time the right and a singularity(aka “god” or the alpha and the omega) in the middle. as one universe on the left ends(omega) the next one on the right starts(alpha). ∞ as the eternal and infinite is known as “brahman” in vedic philosophy and the idea of cyclic universes is the same age. JC did already know this, some people call him son of god, or see him as an incarnation of god, but today we could also call him a master of singularity theory. “god”(theo/deus) is literally and unevitable in every theo-ry and logically conspiracy theory will become conspiracy practice – created by those who believe in conspiracy theory………
Sorry if I offended you, there is truth to it otherwise we wouldn’t have discussed anything from start, it;s just that I feel we talk without ever getting to any conclusion so I got tired. I hope you don’t mind. But it was really nice talking to you. Cheers:)
no matter, that’s my karma( aka fate). i can get very offensive too. there are many conclusions we share, at least all the scientifical descriptions of the universe. to end this universe and to start a new “universe”(literally: versus=towards one) – by singularity of sciences, or oneness(of humanity) is a matter of taking active co-responsibility for co-creation – which i would like you to awaken to. you might like to see yourself as a passive element of the universe, o.k. – you’re not the only one. but: those who are tired seem to need re-creation the most. 🙂
As crazy as it sounds I’d have to agree a little more with Arjun. Because quite simply put, what he talks about is generally true.
Right…here is something from the same realm: http://www.newyorker.com/tech/elements/astrobiology-made-case-god?mbid=social_facebook. Speculation is good when it’s followed by proof. Regarding Rajun’s and others with similar pseudo-scientific claims, so far every serious philosopher dealing with consciousness that actually spent their entire lifes dealing with such problems dismisses this this approach from scratch as it involves a cognitive bias at the core (meaning you cannot make it a universal law as you would make gravity for example) – it is not provable in any way. Check Daniel Dennet or David Chalmers for a better explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kdbs-HUAxC8 and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PyWfVyoz7BQ
“Looking for consciousness in the brain is like looking for the speaker in the radio” Without respecting biophotons caused by our DNA processing we will never understand the miracle of life and creation and the role we are playing as creature, co-creator and our co-creator(E, father)creature(m, son) waveasconsciousnessinternetworking(c²) design.
Nassim Haramein is a good guy – too bad his whole science has been proved gibberish again and again. He screwed up the simplest physics calculations (the base for his whole project) so it seems he does not really understand what he is doing. But if you like conspiracy theories, which I assume you do, this is definitely for you.
PureConsciousness, awareness and imagination are different. The word “consciousness” is used in both ways – as the stuff of which Supreme Reality and Souls are made, and also as awareness. If PureConsciousness, the basic stuff, is real, how can things made of it be not real? Only things imagined by mind are unreal. Universe that comes into existence by vibrations of PureConsciousness is as real as Consciousness itself.
Quantum Physicists think that observer creates results, and so realities; but in double-slit experiment, results are all same when observed. They will not vary if observers’ thoughts and intentions vary. Observer cannot create reality of his choice. Result happens as decided beforehand by nature or creator. So creator is different from observer.
Though observation affects result, it only happens in a predetermined way, not in a way the observer wants. So free-will does not exist. Observer cannot even decide not to affect photons & let them pass thro’ both slits when he observes as they normally do in absence of his observation. Man cannot change reality at will. He can only perceive it as has been determined by creator, his mind and senses creating illusions during the process of observation.
Creation is from vibration of Consciousness to energy to matter, & it is real. Only our perception of world is a little illusory, that too in a fixed way. Different creatures may perceive same world in different ways that are fixed. They do not create different worlds, nor can they see and perceive as they like.
If one electron is assumed to pass thro’ both slits, it is happening in the same world. So man should follow all of different options in same world simultaneously, not in different worlds as scientists presume. But this does not happen; so photons also do not divide & pass through both slits. A different explanation needs to be sought for the phenomenon.
It seems that scientists are getting influenced by a class of philosophers & picking up wrong conclusions from great findings of their experiments. Einstein rightly said, I don’t believe in QuantumPhysics, because even when I am not observing, moon is still there. Patanjali had same view; he wrote, even if world is not there for the liberated, it is there for others.
Conclusion is, neither man has created anything nor can he change anything at will. He himself is created by some other power and is a mere toy in the hands of that power. Even his perceptions of reality are determined by the mechanisms fixed by the creator. If what he perceives is termed reality, then of course it is a different matter. But then, to say “what is” is unreal and what we see is reality, is saying the opposite of truth. What is, i.e. Consciousness with its modifications, is real, and what we see is a little illusory or distorted appearance of that reality. It is not an idea, imagination or creation of our (observers’) minds.
If you want to find something life-changing, look up a book called Alkuajatus – The Original Thought.
were just a giant machine with multiple OSs, thats why we seem separate from each other.
Ok here is my take. Intelligent life , given time, millions of years evolving, could conceivably reach a point of understanding how the universe works, and how to manipulate space time, create other universes and traverse the cosmos. This has likely already happened out there now, to a greater or lesser extent. You can’t claim consciousness creates reality , just because human interaction alters the outcome of quantum experiments. Let’s hold fire and wait until humanity evolves past self destruction, and can understand more before making conclusions. It could be that our search reveals a creator, or that somehow we ourselves are a collective consciousness which created the universe… Until we know more though, we have to believe in physics and mathematics providing an increasing framework within which to hypothesise and test… Technology will accelerate this as you are seeing.
Check for these books; Recently; The Secret … Ralph Waldo Trine`s book from 1897; In tune with infinity, and Nada Brahma; everything is sound… ,a thousands of years old knowledge… and there is also the book; the thirteen sounds of the universe.
Men knows for a long long time that the universe IS ENERGIE and works with that source.
The idea “Consciousness creates reality” can be interpreted differently by different people, depending upon of present world views and root assumptions of how things work. Is “consciousness” simply something that is solely a result of physical reactions occurring in our brains or does it exist independently apart from our physical body? “Creates” is to cause something new to exist. This involves a sequential or linear view of “time” involving cause & effect. “Reality” is often looked at as meaning only the things that exist in the present moment-point.
My experiences have led me to view Reality as being a multidimensional multiverse with time, in one sense, having a simultaneous nature. When the universe came into existence, all possibilities did also. In other words, the physical universe is a complex probability wave function. All probable pasts, presents and futures exist simultaneously. “Time” is no more than a location system by which different moment-points are separated temporally. When cosmologists view the universe they find data that points back to a Big Bang origin located several billions of years ago. Out of all the possibilities, they see what they do because those are the events and processes that had to be actualized in order for the universe to be as it is today and our being here to look at it.
On the human level, for each of us our futures exist as a probability wave function also. Our futures are composed of many different sets of possibilities with varying probabilities that change with our desires and actions. In each instant of our lives our consciousness is directly involved with causing this probability wave function to collapse and have some possibilities actualized as they become the fleeting moments of our experienced physical reality and the others fade to being only probable alternates. In this sense, our consciousness is creating the reality we experience.
If that were the case then wouldn’t the reality stop existing when you were unconscious? I feel like maybe there’s some confusion here… the earth existed for 3.25 billion years before there was anything even conscious living on the planet, the universe existed another 12 billion or so years before that, reality all over the place…. no consciousness, but plenty of reality.
No scientist would say this.
The basic core particle of physical reality is a unit of consciousness of zero size. Combining in different ways these form all the subatomic particles that make up physical reality. Actually, these particles are not “particles” as in little solid objects. They are a collection of forces existing in a probability wave matrix that at times act like a particle would. In one sense the whole universe is conscious. All physical objects have a consciousness that is particular to what they are. The atoms in a rock are not all frozen in position for all time. They all move around and yet the rock retains its shape. While not a logical, emotional, thinking form of consciousness, it is a type that inert physical matter has. It seems our views on what the nature of consciousness is have a different interpretation and understanding.
For humans, unconsciousness is a only a state when the consciousness is not physically focused. It still exists, only focused in non-physical reality.
In your talking of the ages of the Earth and the Universe you are using the linear concept of time found in the mechanistic view of how reality works. Under a multidimensional probability wave view, time is simultaneous. That is, ALL probabilities/possibilities exist now, only in different temporal locations. (see previous post)
I hate to say this, but the understanding of the nature of reality is evolving. Your present views and reaction to these concepts is similar to those that a flat Earther of old would have if you were explaining Black holes and the time-distortion effect to him. Check out http://www.neuroquantology.com/index.php/journal/index and examine some of the articles to get an idea of where science is heading.
What is very interesting is that C S Lewis foresaw some aspects of science converging with mysticism over 60 years ago – the sort of thing we are seeing at CERN in Switzerland with the Large Hadron Collider:
https://thereluctantsamizdatwordpresscom.wordpress.com/2016/03/04/shiva-the-supermen/